英语的过去分词与过去式有什么区别回答完可以帮我回答下面的问题吗?下面的句子中哪一个对 为什么对?I have been saw it.I have been see it.I had been saw it.I had been see it.上面对的句子与I saw it.这个

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/05 20:37:13
英语的过去分词与过去式有什么区别回答完可以帮我回答下面的问题吗?下面的句子中哪一个对 为什么对?I have been saw it.I have been see it.I had been saw it.I had been see it.上面对的句子与I saw it.这个
xURP~<@^ѵ3uciA,% XbOZkxܬx~7 E.놟s=|?sobsspOvp=R,8VqVY=dPK N]CvTj3 :־hWi{**-2JePڱdǺ Vw,HoW?TjCZ$̈́RI(9Wq=LEʤ1>>b1y \xrqyro ˉR7M3?݋.oОbr-0d'&cJu0&NNꁫ}E*( z3}V5GIƌ5D "a)49 X?@0}w#;} R6PݧB9!-پEPϘZr5զ&tzE8do?`{ڱ~v5=*)Q&pNwb7 |0@n}C\b7dQ5LN"(]~k [Y]@=Ş\vL-y SȊ:q<99Ç`uX XLnDA͌ yefH`G=;_ n )G-4}ֽNd˯&{5ٿLh6e x7|9ӋlŴ' 3Hp xS2oqK2%仍_[K m]

英语的过去分词与过去式有什么区别回答完可以帮我回答下面的问题吗?下面的句子中哪一个对 为什么对?I have been saw it.I have been see it.I had been saw it.I had been see it.上面对的句子与I saw it.这个
英语的过去分词与过去式有什么区别
回答完可以帮我回答下面的问题吗?
下面的句子中哪一个对 为什么对?
I have been saw it.
I have been see it.
I had been saw it.
I had been see it.
上面对的句子与I saw it.这个句子有什么区别?

英语的过去分词与过去式有什么区别回答完可以帮我回答下面的问题吗?下面的句子中哪一个对 为什么对?I have been saw it.I have been see it.I had been saw it.I had been see it.上面对的句子与I saw it.这个
过去分词表示被动,与have/had一起构成完成时态.
过去式在句中表示动作发生在过去.
只能是:I have been seen.
I have seen it.
I saw it.
I had seen it.
I had been seen.

过去分词是动词的一种表现,过去式是一种时态。所以这两种有着本质的区别。你提供的四个句子从语法来讲,都错了。因为要用过去分词,see的过去分词是seen。所以正确表达是i have seen it。分别是现在完成时和过去完成时。现在完成时强调动作对现在或将来的影响,而过去完成时只是时态比现在完成时往后推了,并且选择过去完成还是现在完成要根据你表达的意思和语境来进一步判断。过去式只是单纯强调过去的动作...

全部展开

过去分词是动词的一种表现,过去式是一种时态。所以这两种有着本质的区别。你提供的四个句子从语法来讲,都错了。因为要用过去分词,see的过去分词是seen。所以正确表达是i have seen it。分别是现在完成时和过去完成时。现在完成时强调动作对现在或将来的影响,而过去完成时只是时态比现在完成时往后推了,并且选择过去完成还是现在完成要根据你表达的意思和语境来进一步判断。过去式只是单纯强调过去的动作。不懂再问哦!

收起

没有对的,因为完成时的结构为:had been done或have或has been done
i saw it是指我以前见过它,是过去时;而完成时的时间比过去时还要早

过去分词一般应用在完成时中,而过去式一般应用在过去时中。