英语翻译There was no difference between groups on the three fear measures,indicating that the training strategies were ineffective in reducing fire-related fears.Several factors may account for this finding.First,the sample size was small and did

英语翻译There was no difference between groups on the three fear measures,indicating that the training strategies were ineffective in reducing fire-related fears.Several factors may account for this finding.First,the sample size was small and did
英语翻译
There was no difference between groups on the three fear measures,indicating that the training strategies were ineffective in reducing fire-related fears.Several factors may account for this finding.First,the sample size was small and did not exclusively consist of children who were extremely fearful of fire (n=31).The inclusion of moderately fearful children may have contributed to the undesirable outcome.More specifically,21 of the 52 children reported only a moderate level of fire-related far at pre-test.
This finding is consistent with previous investigations in which moderately fearful children made up a substantial part of the sample 8 Therefore,it is likely that only children who have extreme levels of fire-related fear will benefit from fear-reduction strategies such as rehearsal-plus.Given that having a moderate level of fear may be adaptive,fear-reduction strategies should be aimed at reducing extreme levels of fear rather than eliminating these fears completely.Finally,a possible explanation for the ineffectiveness of rehearsal-plus in reducing fear may have been the relatively brief period of the intervention.The sheer volume of information associated with this strategy may have been too rauch for children to process and to comprehend in three days.

英语翻译There was no difference between groups on the three fear measures,indicating that the training strategies were ineffective in reducing fire-related fears.Several factors may account for this finding.First,the sample size was small and did
在对恐惧进行的三项测试的分组之间没有差别,显示出为减少火灾恐惧所指定的培训策略是无效的.有几个因素可以解释这一结果.首先,测试组的样本数量很小,而且并非仅包含对火灾极度恐惧的孩子(样本数量n=31).对火灾只有中度恐惧的孩子可能造成了这个不受欢迎的结果.更特别的是,先期测试的报告显示,52名孩子中的21人仅具有中等火灾恐惧的程度.
这一结果与过去的调查相吻合,即中等恐惧的孩子占据样本组的主要部分.因此,似乎只有那些对火灾极度恐惧的孩子才会在减少恐惧培训策略(例如强化预演培训)中受益.假设中度恐惧会产生适应效果,那么减少恐惧培训策略的目标应该是降低恐惧水平,而不是完全消除这些恐惧感.最后,强化预演培训没有效果的一种可能的解释是间隔时间相对短暂.与这一培训策略有关的全部信息太粗糙,以至于没有办法在三天内让孩子完成并理解培训的内容.
(如果哪里翻译的不易理解,就提出来,我再改.）

两组之间没有显著性差异等三种恐惧措施,表明培训策略在降低fire-related是无效的恐惧。有几个原因可以解释这一发现。首先,样品尺寸小,也并非完全由孩子们非常害怕火(n = 31)。列入的适度可怕的儿童有可能导致不良的结果。更具体地说,21的52个孩子据报道只有一个中等水平的fire-related仍前测问卷发放。
这一发现是一致的,与先前的调查中,适度的可怕的孩子由样品的很大一部分,...

全部展开

两组之间没有显著性差异等三种恐惧措施,表明培训策略在降低fire-related是无效的恐惧。有几个原因可以解释这一发现。首先,样品尺寸小,也并非完全由孩子们非常害怕火(n = 31)。列入的适度可怕的儿童有可能导致不良的结果。更具体地说,21的52个孩子据报道只有一个中等水平的fire-related仍前测问卷发放。
这一发现是一致的,与先前的调查中,适度的可怕的孩子由样品的很大一部分,所以它很可能是唯一的孩子们fire-related极致的恐惧将会受益于fear-reduction rehearsal-plus等策略。假设有一个中等水平的恐惧,可能是自适应,fear-reduction策略应旨在减少极致的恐惧而不是消除这些恐惧完全。最后,有一个可能的解释rehearsal-plus在降低风险的恐惧可能是相对短暂的时期的干预。纯粹的量资讯与此相关联的策略可能表现得太rauch孩子对过程及理解在三天。

收起

针对三种恐惧指标, 各组之间未发现明显的差异. 这表明在减少火灾相关的恐惧方面, 培训战略没有达到实际效果. 以下几项因素可能是导致上述发现的原因: 首先, 样本量过小(n=31), 并且并非完全由特别惧怕火灾的儿童构成. 样本中适度恐惧的儿童可能导致一些意料外的影响. 更为明显地, 在先期测试报告中, 52个儿童中有仅21个对火灾相关的恐惧为适度恐惧级别.
此项发现与此前的调查基本一致,...

全部展开

针对三种恐惧指标, 各组之间未发现明显的差异. 这表明在减少火灾相关的恐惧方面, 培训战略没有达到实际效果. 以下几项因素可能是导致上述发现的原因: 首先, 样本量过小(n=31), 并且并非完全由特别惧怕火灾的儿童构成. 样本中适度恐惧的儿童可能导致一些意料外的影响. 更为明显地, 在先期测试报告中, 52个儿童中有仅21个对火灾相关的恐惧为适度恐惧级别.
此项发现与此前的调查基本一致, 在此前的调查中, 适度恐惧的儿童在8号样本中占了大多数. 因此, 似乎只有特别惧怕火灾的儿童能够从类似灾难演习的减少恐惧战略中获益. 对于适度恐惧的儿童, 只是有可能适用. 减少恐惧战略应该定位在降低特别恐惧的级别, 而不是试图完全消除恐惧. 最后, 对于减少恐惧的演练没有产生实效的另一种可能的解释是, 该结果与干预的简介期有关联, 与该战略相关的大量信息对于儿童来说太复杂, 以至于在三天之内无法处理和领会.

收起