英语翻译Over the past years,international relations scholarship has come under criticism for its failure to problematize state territoriality.Building upon a frequently made critique that the discipline artificially separates domestic and interna

英语翻译Over the past years,international relations scholarship has come under criticism for its failure to problematize state territoriality.Building upon a frequently made critique that the discipline artificially separates domestic and interna
英语翻译
Over the past years,international relations scholarship has come under criticism for its failure to problematize state territoriality.Building upon a frequently made critique that the discipline artificially separates domestic and international politics (Keohane and Nye,1998),critical scholars assert that the territorial state is a relatively recent innovation,its power within its territory rarely has been complete,the mechanisms and meanings of state territoriality have changed significantly over time,and states always have attempted to exercise power outside their borders (Kratochwil,1986; Mann,1984; Ruggie,1993; Taylor,1994).They note that much of the state's authority within its territory comes not from having a 'monopoly of violence' within the space it controls but from participating in a mutual sovereignty pact wherein states recognize each other's terri- torial claims and thereby construct the territorial state system.This has led Taylor (1995) to suggest that the basic unit of analysis in political science should be the states,not the state.Thomson (1994) adds a further element to this critique,asserting that the state system,while normally associated with political control of territory within state boundaries,was not complete until its systemic authority could be asserted in the spaces beyond formal state borders.Rounding out this line of criticism,discourse theorists assert that the legitimacy of the state as a sovereign authority governing territory is buttressed by linguistic practices that 'naturalize' the state-society as a geographical 'fact' (Agnew and Corbridge,1995; Der Derian and Shapiro,1989; 0 Tuathail,1996).Through discursive strate- gies,civil interventions within state space come to be seen as 'natural' and acts of governments and militaries designed to protect state space are portrayed as 'reflexive' acts of self-defence.

英语翻译Over the past years,international relations scholarship has come under criticism for its failure to problematize state territoriality.Building upon a frequently made critique that the discipline artificially separates domestic and interna
这段好难,是这篇论文中的内容吧.Global Communication and the Post-Statism of Cyberspace:A Spatial constructivist view 作者：PE Steinberg (Keohane and Nye,1998)
试着翻译下：
近年来,国际关系学派因为没有将国家领土问题化而受到诟病.基于一个常见的批评论点,即：约束人为地划分出国内和国际政治(Keohane and Nye,1998),批判学者断言,领土国家是一个存在不久的概念,其在领土内的权力很少是完整的,国家领土的机制和意义也随着时间的推移发生了重大变化,并且国家总是试图将其权力行使到边界以外（Kratochwil,1986; Mann,1984; Ruggie,1993; Taylor,1994）.他们指出,国家在其领土内的权威不是来自其控制空间的“垄断的暴力”,而是来自其加入的互相承认主权的协议,这个协议使参加的国家相互承认对方的领土要求,从而构建了领土国家制度.这导致泰勒（1995）表明,政治学分析的基本单位应该是若干国家,而不是一个国家.汤姆逊（1994年）进一步在这个批评论点中增加了一个元素.他指出,国家系统,尽管一般领土的政治控制是在其边界内的,如果不被其正式的国家边界以外的空间所认可,这个系统是不完整的.沿着这一思路,批评理论家断言,一个国家作为主权机构管理领土的合法性实际上是由语言实践支撑的,这个语言实践将国家社会“自然化”成了一个地理的“事实”(Agnew and Corbridge,1995; Der Derian and Shapiro,1989; 0 Tuathail,1996).通过推论,内部干涉在国家空间内被视为'自然的',政府和军队的行为被视为保护国家空间被描绘成“反应性的”自我防卫行为.

在过去的几年里，国际关系学识由于让国家的领土出了问题而遭受了批评。。。得花点时间哈==，一定给你翻译巴适。。。

在过去的几年里,国际关系的奖学金而受到批评problematize未能国家属地。建立在一个频繁地进行批判,纪律人工分离国内与国际政治》(1998),与奈临界学者主张领土状态是一种较为近期的革新,其功率在其领土完整,很少有了机制及意义,并在很大程度上改变了国家属地,美国一直试图行使权力的边界之外,1986年(外交人员、1984;建1993;泰勒,1994年6月初版。他们注意到,很多国家机关在其领土内...

全部展开

在过去的几年里,国际关系的奖学金而受到批评problematize未能国家属地。建立在一个频繁地进行批判,纪律人工分离国内与国际政治》(1998),与奈临界学者主张领土状态是一种较为近期的革新,其功率在其领土完整,很少有了机制及意义,并在很大程度上改变了国家属地,美国一直试图行使权力的边界之外,1986年(外交人员、1984;建1993;泰勒,1994年6月初版。他们注意到,很多国家机关在其领土内的不是来自有暴力的垄断控制之内,但是从参与相互承认协定在国家主权,彼此的特里- torial声称,从而构建领土。这使得·泰勒(1995),建议中的基本分析中应美国政治科学,没有国家。汤姆森(1994)增加了进一步的元素,声称这个批判的国家制度,而通常与政治上的领土边界控制之内,是不完整状态直到它的全身权威可以宣称在空间超出礼仪之邦边界。这条线的批评后,话语理论主张政府的合法性作为一种至高无上的权力控制领土是由语言实践,巩固社会naturalize”作为一种地域的事实”(阿格纽Corbridge(1995年),Derian寒冬,1989;0和约翰·Tuathail,1996)。迈克尔-˙通过散漫的民事干预的状态空间内被视为“自然”的政府和军队,旨在保护状态矢量空间是被描绘成“反”行为的自卫

收起