they are only limited in terms of the materials used to make them.--make them后面省略掉什么?This assumption misses a significant difference between the two disciplines.Fine-art objects are not constrained by the laws of physics in the same way

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/20 09:32:03
they are only limited in terms of the materials used to make them.--make them后面省略掉什么?This assumption misses a significant difference between the two disciplines.Fine-art objects are not constrained by the laws of physics in the same way
xR;N@ XD G;kYBB *(:H$>Nl[v$ Z$Dyog޼ ZB G1d  їS=Gdӏz~R_>Tӳzy F3i `&C%r$!K*"DvG¤BE@G9nWWA;!,ր,"nMyQXVf tOE 7‚B-dhzChianW/}=-_dV^Oàoz~Z=.:bnr6A5hT

they are only limited in terms of the materials used to make them.--make them后面省略掉什么?This assumption misses a significant difference between the two disciplines.Fine-art objects are not constrained by the laws of physics in the same way
they are only limited in terms of the materials used to make them.--make them后面省略掉什么?
This assumption misses a significant difference between the two disciplines.Fine-art objects are not constrained by the laws of physics in the same way that applied-art objects are.Because their primary purpose is not functional,they are only limited in terms of the materials used to make them.请认真帮我回答?

they are only limited in terms of the materials used to make them.--make them后面省略掉什么?This assumption misses a significant difference between the two disciplines.Fine-art objects are not constrained by the laws of physics in the same way
读了次,没省略什么呀?