麻烦帮我解释下下面两句的语法it is strange that he should have left without a word.他竟然一句话没说就离开了,太奇怪了.You should not have left home without a word.你不应该一句话也不说就离开了家.两句只差

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/28 11:34:04
麻烦帮我解释下下面两句的语法it is strange that he should have left without a word.他竟然一句话没说就离开了,太奇怪了.You should not have left home without a word.你不应该一句话也不说就离开了家.两句只差
xVRF}Mn1\{x\{& fz'G_I (5` [#[6~DZ] =k/&qM3 i=췊-C/0Έۥ;n|'|⻧l[ЫTFKmhꋄI3Z2m$ӛ/Wd2,͕_t=x_$A'T?H߉P+j w3 "2P? ˛0{$ ɭ| GMT+ Vҫ $w\yQrnl^.VԀbLjZq$Dp!lj\{jlң^nxRGAG%T\i›g6&脃VEP?;U>$WN= J.e#.``qmTQ-mW'0&>h ݨ'ddVvTpp*_y085b;j I* $TIIHSE(| $#ǵ/y0g/On1cAGp&9;4lr@>x؎:rvŨ !Ki@i"Bt\7  vK< qx]&)ߤ[F ܓbTS7WUEk%EP|g_ee#"#? 恐( B专wCack'cu<ߝ'HC~ӟ

麻烦帮我解释下下面两句的语法it is strange that he should have left without a word.他竟然一句话没说就离开了,太奇怪了.You should not have left home without a word.你不应该一句话也不说就离开了家.两句只差
麻烦帮我解释下下面两句的语法
it is strange that he should have left without a word.
他竟然一句话没说就离开了,太奇怪了.
You should not have left home without a word.
你不应该一句话也不说就离开了家.
两句只差一个not为什么翻译差那么远

麻烦帮我解释下下面两句的语法it is strange that he should have left without a word.他竟然一句话没说就离开了,太奇怪了.You should not have left home without a word.你不应该一句话也不说就离开了家.两句只差
考察情态动词should的用法
两句话的should显然用法是不同的
第一句不要误解,should是单纯的情态动词,译为“竟然",用在表示惊奇、慌惑、怀疑、必要等的名词性从句中,有“吃惊、惊讶”之意.should通常不可省略(这个用法往往被学生忽略).跟后面的have done没有关系.因为这里用should have done翻译是翻译不通的.
have done在这里只是在想你描述时态的问题(现完),说明这件事是过去发生的动作对现在造成的影响
第二句就是should (not)have done了,译为“本(不)该做某事”

第一句话是主语从句,it是形式主语,真正的主语是后面的that从句,这种句型从句中可用虚拟语气,should+动词原形,should have done表示从句动作发生在主句动作之前,是对过去事情的描述。
第二句是虚拟语气should not have done,意思是本不该做某事而做了。...

全部展开

第一句话是主语从句,it是形式主语,真正的主语是后面的that从句,这种句型从句中可用虚拟语气,should+动词原形,should have done表示从句动作发生在主句动作之前,是对过去事情的描述。
第二句是虚拟语气should not have done,意思是本不该做某事而做了。

收起

这两句不是只差not,还是两句的主语根本不一样。第一句里是句子作主语,第二句是you作主语
第一句里,it是主语,这是同位语从句,that 及后面的东西被it代替,it很奇怪,而it只的就是他没说一句话离开了。
第二句里,没有从句,单纯的陈述句,you 是主语。...

全部展开

这两句不是只差not,还是两句的主语根本不一样。第一句里是句子作主语,第二句是you作主语
第一句里,it是主语,这是同位语从句,that 及后面的东西被it代替,it很奇怪,而it只的就是他没说一句话离开了。
第二句里,没有从句,单纯的陈述句,you 是主语。

收起

should
1、用在表示惊奇、慌惑、怀疑、必要等的名词性从句中,有“吃惊、惊讶”之意。should通常不可省略。
第一句这是这种用法;
2、表示义务,责任,可译为“本该”。
第二句这是这种用法;

麻烦帮我解释下下面两句的语法it is strange that he should have left without a word.他竟然一句话没说就离开了,太奇怪了.You should not have left home without a word.你不应该一句话也不说就离开了家.两句只差 帮我解释下下面的电路 .姐姐麻烦你.帮我解释下... 帮我解释下下面英文的意思如图 帮我解释下下面这段代码的意思 It's lucky to gain and fated to miss麻烦帮我解释下 麻烦哪位大虾帮忙解释说明下下面英语句子的语法成分及句子结构:It is our choices that show what we truly are ,far more than our abilies.不好意思是It is our choices that show what we truly are ,far more than our abiliti 这句语法对吗How much does it discount?这个句子语法正确吗?顺便帮我翻译下谢谢! i think it diffiult to study english 这句话省略 is 是什么情况?先看下面两句话i think it diffiult to study englishi think it is diffiult to study english这两句话我知道是对的,但是第一句省略 is 是什么语法情况?如 麻烦高手帮我把下面的语法填空填一下,有解释的更好.(A motto is a sentence or a phrase ________can inspire us especially when we are________(face) with difficult .Many of us have our mottoes,such aswhere there is a will,there is a 帮我解释下第十题的BC两选项 亲,还是一道高中语法题…再帮我看看It is no use _me not to worry about his injury.A.for you to tell B.your telling C.you tell D.having not选什么,能不能详细解释下语法,it's no use 后不是跟动词ing吗?亲,答案给的 对这句英语不是很懂.麻烦谁解释下it is important to understand the process by which our first decisions translate into long-term habits.我的问题是为什么这里用by which 帮我解释下列英语用法语法It is hard for the man to fish with the mokeys there When You're Gone 这句语法对么?这句语法对么? 帮我分析下VV的歌 帮我检查下下面这段英语短文的语法To love is a kind of happiness, caring for others is also a kind of happiness.Love, is take care, it is around us everywhere. We all need love, life is love, not that we love to others, we should go to 这两句英语语法请帮看下...a.He wanted to go abroad,but it was impossible.b.He wanted to go abroad,and it was impossible.意思两句似乎不大一样可是看不太出来请会的帮解释下这种语法搞不太清楚不会的请勿乱回 It is really unhappy without you?麻烦解释下,