急需2012观后感英文版2012的观后感,用英文写的,无语法错误

急需2012观后感英文版2012的观后感,用英文写的,无语法错误
急需2012观后感英文版
2012的观后感,用英文写的,无语法错误

急需2012观后感英文版2012的观后感,用英文写的,无语法错误
2012 Film Feedback:If the world is destroyed,
 
For example,what we have to care about their own Earth,and so I will stop here to say,but does not mean that this is unimportant.We must save water,save energy,not to create a lot of garbage,in order to contribute to their ability to green the Earth!To give those who have the ability to exert greater pressure on the government,it is necessary environmental protection enacted into law,must be given sufficient powers to punish offenders and so on.
 
If you know the world is about to destroy,you will do?Will work overtime to make money?Whether it will continue to care about someone else's vision?If you find a time when the world is destroyed,but not with their own deeply concerned about people who wait in the world with destruction,how will you feel?No regrets do think that this life?
Sometimes people think that our generation some of desolation,born and live in accordance with the requirements of others,why is married,with a house car and continue to fight,or think less of what?Is it because we have enough success?Therefore,we make persistent efforts to fight?Whether we get more things,our hearts still have a hollow,how are all filled up.
Why?Because we have lost,"self."
My mother said a woman on the outside is very hard very tired,very difficult to succeed.They will always be their "success" thinking inertia to us to strengthen the next generation,I asked "What is success?" "Why should I be successful?" "Give me the success of happiness?"
I would not succeed.Success can not give me strength,success will not let me escape from the collapse of success will not let me have peace of mind,success will not let me feel more happy.The "success" is always someone in the eyes of the "success",and "I" has nothing to do.
The most concerned about lost people,my entire people are empty,all my efforts seemed to be going no value,at that moment seems to be completely erased.I have traveled the world that I could walk alone,I thought I was extremely strong,too many "has been that" Gengrang themselves as weak.7 months later,Whenever I think of my grandfather,I am still not stop my tears.
This is the same as destroying the world,when that day comes,you will find a lot of pursuit before you are so in no sense,and the most need to treasure what they overlooked.Are there things you always wanted to because of all sorts of excuses and did not do it?
In fact,many things that do not live helpless,but we ourselves have given too much of an excuse for their own so that they are removed from the trouble of the pursuit of something.We fear the unknown future,we are afraid of their own from scratch,we are afraid that their isolation from society,we are afraid of being hurt,too much fear and anxiety blinded our eyes and hearts so that we can not see the most essential things.
We dare not deny your past self,because the denial of your past self,then what is their own in the end,the pursuit of something,and we do not know.
Our "self" in the end What is this?We ourselves do not know.We lead colorful lives,but in fact is a dead soul.Dry with our souls,so we exhausted all of our loss of spirituality,and even of a very sophisticated makeup,dressed in fine clothes unparalleled,still can not cover the eyes that lose its soul.
Many people can not understand why more than a year,I often change.It was a gamble,gambling all his own,want to bet on their own to find their own thing.I can not stand their own inaction,since the illusion of life to see them,I would have the courage to find my own life.If tomorrow I will die for some reason,I am willing to do this life?I have done some fun things to own it?No.I live in for others.
I just want to MJ,like to exhaust all their vitality and write their own powerful movement.If the world is destroyed,I just want this life without any regrets and cherish who they should be cherished (even if a lot of trouble),they want to do something (even if they will lose many).
Close your eyes observing oneself is the heart,do not just do we have to find ways of salvation,and ultimately will prove that those methods are futile,because the light will light up your heart,only yourself.

It is sounds interesting,I love this movie.

If you have a load of free time (at least two hours and thirty eight minutes) and enough money for a movie ticket and a medium popcorn and a refreshment to wash down that oozy, gooey goodness down, yo...

全部展开

If you have a load of free time (at least two hours and thirty eight minutes) and enough money for a movie ticket and a medium popcorn and a refreshment to wash down that oozy, gooey goodness down, you could do a lot worse than watch "2012." Which is to say that the film in question is escapism that will be forgotten long before the DVD and Blu-Ray comes out; there isn't enough memorable stuff to make this a lasting feeling. I suppose this is a problem -- the film attempts (read: poorly) to make you believe that the end of the world is near, and they have incomprehensible science to prove it! I don't know about you, but if the end of the world is anything as tame as it is in the film (what, with John Cusack -- "Martian Child" John Cusack, not "High Fidelity" or "Say Anything…" John Cusack -- as a divorced dad whose children call him by his real name rather than the traditional "dad" or "father"), I'd prefer a mercy killing. Sitting in a theater seat and having to listen to everybody "ooh" and "aww" at all the moments of suspense, I was expecting the kind of cheese ball goodness that I'm usually given during these disaster flicks. You know, shots of Japan in chaos with citizens speaking perfect English, crying out "Nobody can save us but Abra!"
It's not like that at all. Sure, there are a few moments of incompetence that you just have to giggle in your seat while the person on your left moves awkwardly, but not as much as I'd like. I had such a ball whenever the ground started to crack and Cusack's character tried to out-drive the end of the world in a limo -- a limo! -- or whenever the boyfriend of Cusack's ex-wife (played by the delightful Amanda Peet) who only had a lesson or two behind the wheel of a plane flies like it's nothing special. You know, whenever you are sucked to the Earth's core and you have to fly upwards through the resistance, dodging crumbling buildings and an Amtrak or two.
So much of "2012" is just geologists and other apparently relevant scientists arguing about how quickly the Earth will be destroyed. They use big words a lot, and build these "space ships" (…um…) that can apparently withstand all the hellish things that happen. I didn't leave my seat for the bathroom once, and I didn't play that "guess how many pieces of gum are under my seat" game that I play whenever I find myself excessively bored, but damn it all if I didn't find myself scratching my head while trying to make heads or tails out of the math and science that apparently was so logical to everybody in the movie. I'm unsure if a second viewing will ease my bafflement.
Is the acting any good? I feel it obligatory to mention how well the actors meshed with the material, even if the film is more of a music video rather than something of substance. Cameos by Woody Harrelson and Danny Glover are frustratingly and infinitely more interesting than the leads we're forced to ride with while the Earth sees its last days. Why, may I ask, did the screenwriter think we'd want to delve into the classic failed romance theme whenever, you know, there are more interesting things to wrap ourselves around. You know, for a movie that shows us what happens on the last days of Earth, it sure as hell seems destined to distract us from the big picture. I thought watching buildings shake and break and trains careen into their doom would play a bigger importance than romance. I guess I was wrong.
Oh, and another thing: "2012" attempts to cater to my heart way too much for its own good. At least three times (I may be off by one or two), a tearful phone call is had between a father and their children as they say goodbye. These goodbyes don't pack the emotional punch you'd expect, though; we hardly know the people that have minute long phone conversations, so we find it hard to fall in a puddle of our tears. I'm reminded of an infinitely better disaster (and romance!) film, "Titanic," and that short shot that we're all familiar to: when an elderly couple we haven't seen before and will never see again cuddle in their bed one last time as water enters there room, soon to drown them. As much as I hate to give more credit to a director with such a large ego, James Cameron knows how to grab that sentimental tug much better than Roland Emmerich can ever aspire to. Emmerich, you may remember, directed "The Day After Tomorrow" and "Independence Day" -- neither being tearjerkers. And that's perfectly okay, if only the movie didn't try endlessly to get us to feel something.
I'm nitpicking. For a film as hard to follow -- especially during the climax, which you'll agree is quite important to follow -- as "2012" is, there's enough explosions and whatnot to make you feel not completely gypped out of your hard-earned cash. For what it's worth, the movie flew by, even if it was at the expense of us getting any relatable characters. There are too many great movies out this season to waste your money on something like this -- unless you do have a coupon to get in for five dollars and you want a carefree Saturday night with no intent on learning anything from a movie. In that case, enjoy.

收起