《翻译》中美教育差异 我要谁能帮我把中文翻译成英文 谢谢大家 谢谢我认为中国的基础教育最根本的特点是以考试论英雄.这就决定了我们的课程起点高、难度大、知识面窄.孩子在学校里

《翻译》中美教育差异 我要谁能帮我把中文翻译成英文 谢谢大家 谢谢我认为中国的基础教育最根本的特点是以考试论英雄.这就决定了我们的课程起点高、难度大、知识面窄.孩子在学校里
《翻译》中美教育差异 我要谁能帮我把中文翻译成英文 谢谢大家 谢谢
我认为中国的基础教育最根本的特点是以考试论英雄.这就决定了我们的课程起点高、难度大、知识面窄.孩子在学校里要做太多的作业,要考太多的试,要背太多的文章.孩子们几乎没有任何可以自由支配的时间来满足自己的爱好.老师们也基本上不会鼓励和挖掘孩子们学习以外的各种潜能.反观生活在美国的孩子就幸福得多了.他们基本上没有家庭作业,下午2点放学后大多去参加各种各样的课外活动.即便是考试,老师也不会给学生排名次,学生们也从不在意谁考得好或不好.相反,如果某个孩子有某种特长,则会受到其它同学的羡慕和尊敬.我想,这主要是因为美国的老师普遍认为学生的实际动手能力,特别是创造力远远比那些书本上枯燥乏味并与实际生活毫无关系的抽象理论重要得多. 中国的学生是多学、多练、多记、多考,培养孩子吸收知识、学习行为和接受能力.美国的学生是多看、多问、多想、多干,注重培养学生的批判性思维、独立思考能力、创造性、发现问题解决问题、学以致用的实践能力.从深层次思考,我认为,培养考生还是培养学生?是中美教育的根本区别,也是应试教育和素质教育的本质区别.培养考生是把有问题的教得没问题；培养学生是把没有问题的教得有问题. 美国没有全国性的课程标准,但各州、郡甚至学区都可以自行编订课程标准.从总体上看,美国的课程设置相当灵活,主要包括必修课和选修课两大类.必修课所占的学分较多,内容广但不深,强调学生的实践能力、思维能力及认识问题、解决问题的能力.选修课种类繁多,多达上百种,主要是依据学生升学、就业和社会生活的实际需要而定,学生可以根据自己的兴趣自由的去选择,取得规定的学分即可. 比较我们现行的课程设置和教材体系,我们的情况与美国恰恰相反.大一统的要求,千篇一律准则,灵活与个性不够.目前我们施行的课程方案中,必修课的地位相当突出,教学时数多,知识要求高,统一的课标,甚至是统一的教材. 我们的课堂教学相对美国来讲,班级人数过多,课堂容量大、要求高,课堂氛围比较严肃呆板.这样虽然给学生打下了系统扎实的基础,但同时也带来了课堂不活跃,老师讲得多,学生思考得少的弊端,典型的以教师为主的教学模式,这是中国基础教育课堂尤其是高中课堂的共性.而美国课堂班额小、氛围自由、宽松,上课期间学生可以随意走动,自由辩论,表达自己的观点,是典型的以学生为主的教学模式. 由此可见,中美在教育观念、教育模式和方法上存在着巨大的差异.中国的教育更多的是一种模式教育；而美国则侧重于强调创新精神,强调个人主义,是一种精英式的教育.从本质上讲,侧重于创新还是侧重于打基础是美国基础教育和中国基础教育的根本区别.

《翻译》中美教育差异 我要谁能帮我把中文翻译成英文 谢谢大家 谢谢我认为中国的基础教育最根本的特点是以考试论英雄.这就决定了我们的课程起点高、难度大、知识面窄.孩子在学校里
I think that China's basic education is the most fundamental characteristics of hero on the exams. This determines the our course high starting point, difficult, narrow range of knowledge. School children to do too much homework, should take an examination of too much try, to back too many articles. The children hardly any free time to meet their own hobbies. Teachers are basically won't encourage and mining children learn outside of the various potential. Life in the United States in children as much happiness. They basically no homework, 2 PM most after school to attend all kinds of extracurricular activities. Even the exam, the teacher also won't give students ranked, students also from don't care who does well or bad. Instead, if a child has some special skill, and will be influenced by other classmates envy and the respect. I think, this is mainly because the teacher is that students' practical ability, especially the creativity is far more than those books boring and and practical life no relationship of abstract theory is much more important. Chinese students is to learn more, practice more, remember more, many tests, train the children to absorb the knowledge, learning behavior and accept ability. The student in the United States is look more, ask more, more, more to do, pay attention to the training of the students' critical thinking, independent thinking ability, creative, found that the problem solving problems, to apply the practice ability. From deep thinking, I think, cultivate the examinee or training students'? The education is the fundamental difference between exam-oriented education and quality education is the essential difference between. Cultivate students with problems is no teaching; To cultivate students is to teach without problems. The United States does not have the national curriculum standard, but to state, county school districts and can to development curriculum standard. Generally speaking, the United States curriculum quite flexible, mainly including the required courses and elective course two kinds big. Compulsory credits of more, wide but not deep content, emphasize the students' practical ability, thinking ability and understand the issues, to solve the question ability. Elective course sort is various, as many as, mainly is the basis of student entrance, employment and social life of the actual need and decide, students can according to their interests free to choose, get credits stipulated by then. Compare our current curriculum and teaching material system, our situation and the United States is just the opposite. The requirements of the whole unification, machine-made standards, flexible and personality is not enough. At present we of course and scheme, the status of the required course is serious, the teaching hours, knowledge the demand is high, unified course standard, even is the unity of teaching materials. Our classroom teaching relatively the United States speaking, class sizes too much, the classroom of large capacity, high requirements, classroom atmosphere more serious and inflexible. Although such a system to give students a solid foundation of, but also brings a classroom not active, the teacher speak more, students think less of the disadvantages, and typical to teachers mainly teaching mode, this is China foundation education class especially high school classroom similar. And the United States class size, small classroom atmosphere free, loose, class period students can wander about, free debate, express his views, it is typical in which the majority of students teaching mode. Therefore, China and the United States on education idea, the education mode and method are great difference. China's education is more of a model education; And the United States are focusing on the emphasize the spirit of innovation, stressed individualism, is a kind of elite of education. In essence, focus on innovation or focus on the foundation education and China is the foundation of the fundamental difference between based education.