in front of which 这种结构引起倒装的问题The hens lay eggs,out of which come other chickens.The bus was already crowded,in the front of which were sitting a few children. 我想问的是 像这种结构(介词+which在定语从句中充
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/07/18 01:53:20
![in front of which 这种结构引起倒装的问题The hens lay eggs,out of which come other chickens.The bus was already crowded,in the front of which were sitting a few children. 我想问的是 像这种结构(介词+which在定语从句中充](/uploads/image/z/12233771-35-1.jpg?t=in+front+of+which+%E8%BF%99%E7%A7%8D%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E5%BC%95%E8%B5%B7%E5%80%92%E8%A3%85%E7%9A%84%E9%97%AE%E9%A2%98The+hens+lay+eggs%2Cout+of+which+come+other+chickens.The+bus+was+already+crowded%2Cin+the+front+of+which+were+sitting+a+few+children.+%E6%88%91%E6%83%B3%E9%97%AE%E7%9A%84%E6%98%AF+%E5%83%8F%E8%BF%99%E7%A7%8D%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%EF%BC%88%E4%BB%8B%E8%AF%8D%2Bwhich%E5%9C%A8%E5%AE%9A%E8%AF%AD%E4%BB%8E%E5%8F%A5%E4%B8%AD%E5%85%85)
in front of which 这种结构引起倒装的问题The hens lay eggs,out of which come other chickens.The bus was already crowded,in the front of which were sitting a few children. 我想问的是 像这种结构(介词+which在定语从句中充
in front of which 这种结构引起倒装的问题
The hens lay eggs,out of which come other chickens.
The bus was already crowded,in the front of which were sitting a few children.
我想问的是 像这种结构(介词+which在定语从句中充当地点状语)可不可以不用倒装?
用正常的语序,The bus was already crowded,in the front of which a few children were sitting.
这样用对吗?
in front of which 这种结构引起倒装的问题The hens lay eggs,out of which come other chickens.The bus was already crowded,in the front of which were sitting a few children. 我想问的是 像这种结构(介词+which在定语从句中充
首先应该肯定你提供的不同说法也是正确的.
但是,如果你从倒装这个语法角度看这个问题,就会理解原句的道理.倒装分部分倒装和全倒装.那么你提供的两个定语从句部分可以认为是全倒装的典型例子,即表示方位的介词短语或者表示方向(方位)的副词放在句首,且句子的主语是名词或者名词短语(不是代词),那么采用直接将主语和谓语颠倒位置的语序.下面再给几个单句来加深倒装的概念:
On the desk lay an English book
In front of the house was a tall tree.
There goes the bell
但是如果主语是代词时,则不可以倒装,例如:
Here it is!
Here you are!
将上面的这个简单句移植到定语从句里,你应该能明白为什么原来的定语从句的语序了吧?也该明白你的改法也是正确的,不过用的是普通陈述语序.