英语翻译Both figures show that the system can effectively analyze water quality.Fig.5 shows that the measured water quality remained well below the warning line (i.e.,the COD level at which additional water must be released to maintain water qual

英语翻译Both figures show that the system can effectively analyze water quality.Fig.5 shows that the measured water quality remained well below the warning line (i.e.,the COD level at which additional water must be released to maintain water qual
英语翻译
Both figures show that the system can effectively analyze water quality.Fig.5 shows that the measured water quality remained well below the warning line (i.e.,the COD level at which additional water must be released to maintain water quality at an acceptable level) in 2004 and on 5/9/2005,but exceeded the warning line on 30/8/2005,which indicates that water released from the environmental reservoir during the first three periods was higher than the amount required,and that some clean water was wasted.The information provided by the water management system thus supported a decision to reduce the amount of water released,and the required reduction in water flow was thus obtained using hydrological–environmental modeling.Water quality remained acceptable (i.e.,COD remained below the warning line) when water flow was reduced by 0.5m3/s.Soon after this change,the trend line for water quality produced by the simulation remained gentle and the water release rate remained steady,indicating that no new source of water pollution had been detected and that the assimilative capacity of the river remained satisfactory.

英语翻译Both figures show that the system can effectively analyze water quality.Fig.5 shows that the measured water quality remained well below the warning line (i.e.,the COD level at which additional water must be released to maintain water qual
两个图都显示了这个系统可以有效地分析水的质量.图5显示了在2004年和2005年9月5日,被测量的水的质量很好地保持在警示线以下（也就是说,COD水平下过量的水必须被排放以保持水质在一个可接受的标准）,但是在2005年8月30日的时候却超过了警示线,这表示在前三期从水库中被排放出去的是比要求的量要高,而且有很多干净的水是被浪费掉了.由水管理体系所提供的信息支持了减少水排放量的观点,要求减少的水流量因此也得以用于水文学的环境模型中.当水流量减少0.5m3/s的,水质保持在了一个可以接受的范围中（换言之COD保持在警示线以下）.在这个改变之后不久,模拟出的水质的趋势非常缓和,水排放量率也会比较稳定,也说明没有检测到任何新的水污染源,而且河流的同化能力也会持续在一个符合标准的状态.
PS：如果我有个别术语翻译的不是很准确就原谅我吧,毕竟我不是学这个的,但是我自认为翻译得还可以,希望可以对你有所帮助.

两个图都显示该系统能够有效地分析水质。图5显示，在2004年和在2005年9月5日测量到的水质都远低於警戒线的水平（即必须释放更多水来令水质保持在可接受水平的化学需氧量）。不过在2005年8月30日所测量到的水质则超出警戒线。换言之，在头三个时期从环保水库排放的水超过了所需数量，因而浪费了部份清水。在这方面，清水管理系统所提供的数据，也支持减少排放清水的决定。至於需要减少的数量，则透过水力及环境模...

全部展开

两个图都显示该系统能够有效地分析水质。图5显示，在2004年和在2005年9月5日测量到的水质都远低於警戒线的水平（即必须释放更多水来令水质保持在可接受水平的化学需氧量）。不过在2005年8月30日所测量到的水质则超出警戒线。换言之，在头三个时期从环保水库排放的水超过了所需数量，因而浪费了部份清水。在这方面，清水管理系统所提供的数据，也支持减少排放清水的决定。至於需要减少的数量，则透过水力及环境模拟来确定。当水流每秒减少0.5立方米时，水质仍在可接受水平（即化学需氧量仍低於警戒线）。在作出这项改变后不久，模拟实验所产生的水质趋势线便保持平缓，而排水速度也保持平稳，显示没有侦测到任何新的水污染来源，而且，河流的消化能力也令人满意。

收起