GMAT逻辑题 请教各位牛牛们啊!O(∩_∩)O~~86. Keith: Compliance with new government regulationsrequiring the installation of smoke alarms andsprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will costthe entertainment industry $25 billion annual

来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：作业帮 时间：2024/11/24 14:43:53
GMAT逻辑题 请教各位牛牛们啊!O(∩_∩)O~~86. Keith: Compliance with new government regulationsrequiring the installation of smoke alarms andsprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will costthe entertainment industry $25 billion annual
xU[OG+RR*BT "5mx{5^'ngvLD K\ƤM/_ ,3&.qڰ;~H;[~__OYo9= Sss|r7΂,RW {$.a\Է!N3@OE %aȊ2a_I"T'c e;X1eDƢB>#R<=rP(NEJSy2!L0'įIĊ(1ۯ8zXp̳J\Kdb 2]&QWt6tvEѳL[9Y@@lv(c^3e8]͗2s_e(NtLeBpuZ^5oUQNG-4Uc3hU>U^k WVgx+893cnM7/.wpvŪ[mkto/>:r5Rz;h L{>髵^sC_9j} Һmasx^-ON.c/Z~ؾp]0;1Q>}x{

GMAT逻辑题 请教各位牛牛们啊!O(∩_∩)O~~86. Keith: Compliance with new government regulationsrequiring the installation of smoke alarms andsprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will costthe entertainment industry $25 billion annual
GMAT逻辑题 请教各位牛牛们啊!O(∩_∩)O~~
86. Keith: Compliance with new government regulations
requiring the installation of smoke alarms and
sprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will cost
the entertainment industry $25 billion annually.
Consequently, jobs will be lost and profits diminished.
Therefore, these regulations will harm the country's
economy.
Laura: The $25 billion spent by some businesses will
be revenue for others. Jobs and profits will be gained
as well as lost.
Laura responds to Keith by
(A) demonstrating that Keith's conclusion is
based on evidence that is not relevant to the
issue at hand
(B) challenging the plausibility of the evidence that
serves as the basis for Keith's argument
(C) suggesting that Keith's argument overlooks a
mitigating consequence
(D) reinforcing Keith's conclusion by supplying a
complementary interpretation of the evidence
Keith cites
(E) agreeing with the main conclusion of Keith's
argument but construing that conclusion as
grounds for optimism rather than for pessimism
答案选C,我理解为什么C对,但我觉得D和E也没有错,OG上解释说,D和E的前半部分错在“Laura rejects rather than reinforces Keith's conclusion”,但我认为,Laura并没有否定Keith的结论,就想题目中说的：“Laura: The $25 billion spent by some businesses will be revenue for others. Jobs and profits will be gained as well as lost.” 这不就是在赞同K的基础上,再加以解释吗?希望各位NN们帮助啊,谢谢!~~~~~O(∩_∩)O~~

GMAT逻辑题 请教各位牛牛们啊!O(∩_∩)O~~86. Keith: Compliance with new government regulationsrequiring the installation of smoke alarms andsprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will costthe entertainment industry $25 billion annual
你的理解有点偏颇.
Laura的确否定了Keith的结论,Keith的结论是：Consequently,jobs will be lost and profits diminished.Therefore,these regulations will harm the country's economy.
Laura并不认为这些regulations会损害economy,因为The $25 billion spent by some businesses will be revenue for others.Jobs and profits will be gained as well as lost.
看题目不要只看一半,“抓住最终的结论是什么”是GMAT逻辑解题的王道.

GMAT逻辑题 请教各位牛牛们啊!O(∩_∩)O~~86. Keith: Compliance with new government regulationsrequiring the installation of smoke alarms andsprinkler systems in all theaters and arenas will costthe entertainment industry $25 billion annual 请教GMAT OG 逻辑 79 gmat逻辑题英语 请教一道GMAT语法题 GMAT逻辑如何训练? gmat 逻辑怎么提高 GMAT逻辑如何准备?、 GMAT OG 逻辑 99, GMAT OG 逻辑 107, GMAT OG 逻辑 GMAT阅读题如何准确定位文章大体能看懂,逻辑框架也大体明白,但是只能看个大体,细节什么的根本记不住而且回原文找又找不到正确地方,请教各位大牛是如何准备定位的?文章细节又是如何处 gmat逻辑题求解答答案是900和1800 准备GMAT 求教OG13 逻辑 79题,为何如此思考? GMAT逻辑正确率如何提高 GMAT逻辑正确率如何提高 GMAT OG 逻辑77,B, 请教各位大牛,GMAT阅读题是怎么做的?一篇阅读看一遍根本记不住,但是看两遍时间又不够.而且有人说要抓GMAT阅读的结构,怎么做到?谢谢 GMAT培训逻辑部分,该怎么提高呢?GMAT复习中,做了几套模拟题发现自己语文很差,尤其是逻辑部分,该怎么提高呢?