这里有个简单从句有点不理解The New Yorkers we talked to were very nice.we talked to 应该是The New Yorkers 的从句.是这样的,不明白的是to能不能去掉...一般碰到句子,只要to啊,什么的介词,后面是空的,那种

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/25 05:34:53
这里有个简单从句有点不理解The New Yorkers we talked to were very nice.we talked to 应该是The New Yorkers 的从句.是这样的,不明白的是to能不能去掉...一般碰到句子,只要to啊,什么的介词,后面是空的,那种
xRMn@` U7]U(;@bcn4 ITljBx+ RªQn*Y{l)t&z_LhX;7IܠTZ Uےʪ_o/%Mިڶꅪ<;o@RYk,ɈHZmzΰpĩ+3^f0veh^aE/gHn6dp#;}:jdk?}ڰ'^Bz`&!Dpk耴d +Du0+~2Ҥ$2Ρp W T!|]/{D|jWl n'hP腼.˂>۸yEM2Gdp}ƾWIu&tq҂1ߣ3wܙ S>ⱎi%b"\dtKhF6`[f>KPS<rR%K?Y8IIcyd'b9[θG9cEe)Uƨ:wtB;

这里有个简单从句有点不理解The New Yorkers we talked to were very nice.we talked to 应该是The New Yorkers 的从句.是这样的,不明白的是to能不能去掉...一般碰到句子,只要to啊,什么的介词,后面是空的,那种
这里有个简单从句有点不理解
The New Yorkers we talked to were very nice.
we talked to 应该是The New Yorkers 的从句.
是这样的,不明白的是to能不能去掉...一般碰到句子,只要to啊,什么的介词,后面
是空的,那种句子我就开始晕了...
能否多讲讲,这类东西啊,就是介词后面不带东西的句子...

这里有个简单从句有点不理解The New Yorkers we talked to were very nice.we talked to 应该是The New Yorkers 的从句.是这样的,不明白的是to能不能去掉...一般碰到句子,只要to啊,什么的介词,后面是空的,那种
不可以,其实yorkers后面是省略了who/that 把先行词New Yorkers代进去后巨资才是完整的,一般介词或to 都是很少省略的.遇到这种题,把先行词带进从句里,做的时候清晰很多.

不可以,其实yorkers后面是省略了who/that 把先行词New Yorkers带进去后才是完整的.to 和talk构成短语,意思是和...交谈.遇到这种题,当动词是不及物动词的时候,要加介词,这样的短语才能接宾语.

这里有个简单从句有点不理解The New Yorkers we talked to were very nice.we talked to 应该是The New Yorkers 的从句.是这样的,不明白的是to能不能去掉...一般碰到句子,只要to啊,什么的介词,后面是空的,那种 有点不理解 有点不理解 ···英语问题·人脑译Finally, a new patient has to sign the clinic’s privacy policy, “indicating” that he or she understands how medical information may be shared with “third parties” 有点不理解何意?最好简单讲讲美国 线性代数有个问题不理解, The man to whom you just talked is my father.这里改为简单句是不是所有定语从句翻译成简单句都要先分主句 再从句啊 run-of-the-mill什么意思?不要字典的简单看不懂的说明,我这里有5个字典 有个英语句子不理解some birds aren’t meant to be caged这里的mean(meant)什么意思 一句VOA解释That is why most states approved the new Constitution only on condition that a Bill of Rights would be added.only on conditin……这里很迷惑,因为它的意思不明白,所以它接着的that从句后面的意思也显得有点 关于初中的定语从句A lot of new countries whose names I had never heard of before were shown on the map.这里引导词为什么是whose 而不是which 或者 that 虽然后面是names 但是还是觉得有点矛盾啊 因为先行词countrie 请问这个定语从句中的谓语在哪里The professor can hardly find sufficient grounds on which to base his argument in favor of the new theory.在这个句子里面有个定语从句,on which to base his argument in favor of the new theory. the new law will come into effect on the day it is passed中后面 it is passed是个从句吗,什么从句 if I had the money,I would have bought the DVD player.从句中不是对现在事实的假设吗?had嘛,但后面干嘛还用过去事实的假设?不理解,非常不理解,希望有谁帮忙详解. 这里有宾语从句吗?He asked me what was the matter with me. 请英语好的同学帮我解决一个我问题 我有点糊涂 现在有两个简单句The boy is my brother.The boy is standing at the door.现在变成定语从句 正确的是 The boy who is standing at the door is my brother.但是我有时间 Is the woman our new teacher?I want to know.(改为宾语从句)I(中间有两个空格)the woman is our new teacher. 很多语法书上都有什么从句啊之类的,但我不理解从句的意义.什么是从句? Life isn't about how to live through the storm,but how to dance in the rain这句话是宾语从句吗?书上的语法分析是:这是一个简单句.“how to.”作“about”的宾语.可是我觉得这里应该有宾语从句啊.因为to live t