这题的possession 为何不加s.不是说possessions才表示财产么?He took a large amount of possession when his father died,but he run through it just few years.这题的possession 为何不加s?不是说possessions才表示财产么?a large a

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/07/17 01:40:01
这题的possession 为何不加s.不是说possessions才表示财产么?He took a large amount of possession when his father died,but he run through it just few years.这题的possession 为何不加s?不是说possessions才表示财产么?a large a
xNP_eh}ڒ6fWŲ[D"&b@c@.9핯I@n^yդggR.øY(% lI ^i ~aE~N ,2Dz]$YUg:1A7(4G'6dEɻlG-W:P h6ͼɹN9o'}r&z&vCQZ?&|)[QEQ *IwZ`g~M8M=}7_3ކ-O.i.?7u^*bg3{˓U,fb^s2N0nDA ~Y,ғ6~_Yݰq=Qq 6*6`CiMI ƈMZ6IP5KK

这题的possession 为何不加s.不是说possessions才表示财产么?He took a large amount of possession when his father died,but he run through it just few years.这题的possession 为何不加s?不是说possessions才表示财产么?a large a
这题的possession 为何不加s.不是说possessions才表示财产么?
He took a large amount of possession when his father died,but he run through it just few years.
这题的possession 为何不加s?不是说possessions才表示财产么?a large amount of 不是只接不可数名词么?都弄不清除了,
牛津上解释说 possession尤作复数时译为:所有物,财产。

这题的possession 为何不加s.不是说possessions才表示财产么?He took a large amount of possession when his father died,but he run through it just few years.这题的possession 为何不加s?不是说possessions才表示财产么?a large a
没听过这种说法吧,我只听过belongings作“所有物,财产”时是必加s的.从Possession前面的a large amount of就可以看出possession是作为不可数名词用的,因为amount of后面一定是接不可数名词的,这一点你是对的.