修改翻译英文段落让“普通人来裁判普通人”,这就是这种陪审制度的安排.它与真理无关,但与真理无关并不意味与人们的幸福生活无关,也不意味着人类的生活没有建立起基本的确定性.这种

修改翻译英文段落让“普通人来裁判普通人”,这就是这种陪审制度的安排.它与真理无关,但与真理无关并不意味与人们的幸福生活无关,也不意味着人类的生活没有建立起基本的确定性.这种
修改翻译英文段落
让“普通人来裁判普通人”,这就是这种陪审制度的安排.它与真理无关,但与真理无关并不意味与人们的幸福生活无关,也不意味着人类的生活没有建立起基本的确定性.这种制度的确是有很大缺陷的.
由此,我们才有可能审视这个制度所具有的好处和缺陷.正如那个坚强的陪审员所说,“普通人也会犯错误.”所以这个制度也许是比较脆弱的,脆弱得就像人的生命一样；但这个制度无疑也是强大的,因为它是人类为了更好保卫自身、为了延续自己生命而创造出来的,它捍卫了人类基本的自由和权利、捍卫了神圣的尊严和价值.
Arrangement dodging "to come to rule that average person , this are this jury system average person". It has nothing to do with truth, but the independence determines the nature basically indeed with truth starting from when implication a happy life independence with people , the life implying human being neither do not build. This system has very big defects indeed.
From this, we are in the cards scanning benefit and defect had by this system just now. Be exactly as what that firm juror says ", average person also may make a mistake ". Therefore this system maybe is comparatively fragile,fragility has to look like people's life right away; This system has been also big and powerful but beyond doubt , it has defended fundamental liberty of human being and right , has defended sacred dignity and has been worth because of it is that human be created by out to continue self life for defending oneself , better.

修改翻译英文段落让“普通人来裁判普通人”,这就是这种陪审制度的安排.它与真理无关,但与真理无关并不意味与人们的幸福生活无关,也不意味着人类的生活没有建立起基本的确定性.这种
So that "ordinary people appear to ordinary people," This is such a jury system.It has nothing to do with the truth,but it has nothing to do with the truth and does not mean that people's happy life has nothing to do,nor does it mean that human life does not establish a fundamental uncertainty.Such a system is very flawed.
As a result,we may have to examine this system has the advantages and shortcomings.As the jurors that the firm said,"people will make mistakes." So the system may be more fragile,vulnerable as a human life,like; but no doubt the system is powerful because it is more to human Good to defend itself,in order to extend their lives and created it to defend the basic human freedoms and rights,to defend the sacred dignity and value.

Let “the average person come the referee average person”, this is this kind of jury system's arrangement. It has nothing to do with the truth, but has nothing to do with the truth did not mean that ha...

全部展开

Let “the average person come the referee average person”, this is this kind of jury system's arrangement. It has nothing to do with the truth, but has nothing to do with the truth did not mean that has nothing to do with people's happy life, also does not mean that humanity's life has not established the basic determinism. This system indeed has the very big flaw. from this, we only then have the possibility to carefully examine the advantage which and the flaw this system has. Just like that strong juror said that “the average person will also make a mistake.”Perhaps therefore this system is quite frail, is frail looks like person's life to be the same; But this system is also without doubt formidable, because it is the humanity, for better defends own, to continue oneself life to create, it has guarded humanity's basic freedom and the right, has guarded the sacred dignity and the value.

收起

让“普通人来裁判普通人”，这就是这种陪审制度的安排。它与真理无关，但与真理无关并不意味与人们的幸福生活无关，也不意味着人类的生活没有建立起基本的确定性。这种制度的确是有很大缺陷的。
由此，我们才有可能审视这个制度所具有的好处和缺陷。正如那个坚强的陪审员所说，“普通人也会犯错误。”所以这个制度也许是比较脆弱的，脆弱得就像人的生命一样；但这个制度无疑也是强大的，因为它是人类为了更好保卫自身、...

全部展开

让“普通人来裁判普通人”，这就是这种陪审制度的安排。它与真理无关，但与真理无关并不意味与人们的幸福生活无关，也不意味着人类的生活没有建立起基本的确定性。这种制度的确是有很大缺陷的。
由此，我们才有可能审视这个制度所具有的好处和缺陷。正如那个坚强的陪审员所说，“普通人也会犯错误。”所以这个制度也许是比较脆弱的，脆弱得就像人的生命一样；但这个制度无疑也是强大的，因为它是人类为了更好保卫自身、为了延续自己生命而创造出来的，它捍卫了人类基本的自由和权利、捍卫了神圣的尊严和价值。
So that "ordinary people appear to ordinary people," This is such a jury system. It has nothing to do with the truth, but it has nothing to do with the truth and does not mean that people's happy life has nothing to do, nor does it mean that human life does not establish a fundamental uncertainty. Such a system is very flawed.
As a result, we may have to examine this system has the advantages and shortcomings. As the jurors that the firm said, "people will make mistakes." So the system may be more fragile, vulnerable as a human life, like; but no doubt the system is powerful because it is more to human Good to defend itself, in order to extend their lives and created it to defend the basic human freedoms and rights, to defend the sacred dignity and value.

收起