飞屋环游记英文影评大概150字左右,高2水平即可,大概介绍一下电影,并说一下自己的感受即可150字就行了要是好还给加分

飞屋环游记英文影评大概150字左右,高2水平即可,大概介绍一下电影,并说一下自己的感受即可150字就行了要是好还给加分
飞屋环游记英文影评
大概150字左右,高2水平即可,大概介绍一下电影,并说一下自己的感受即可
150字就行了
要是好还给加分

飞屋环游记英文影评大概150字左右,高2水平即可,大概介绍一下电影,并说一下自己的感受即可150字就行了要是好还给加分
UP
Up is another must-see animated film from Pixar Animation Studios. It's about a cranky old man and an overeager Scout who fly to South America in a floating house suspended from helium balloons. Up is director Pete Docter's (Monsters, Inc.) second feature-length film, and features the voices of Edward Asner, Christopher Plummer, Bob Peterson and Jordan Nagai. It is the first Pixar film to be presented in Disney Digital 3-D.
Up is definitely one of the better Pixar efforts. It's about the grandeur and excitement of flight and adventure. The first ten minutes of the film about Carl Fredricksen and his life-long love Ellie are surprisingly touching. It's heartbreaking to see him lose his wife even at old age. With nothing left to do Fredricksen heads for South America, but he's not alone. Russell, a Wilderness Explorer trying to earn his "Assisting the Elderly" badge, has stowed away on the porch after being sent on a snipe hunt by Carl the day before. The relationship of father and son that forms between Fredricksen and Russell is completely believable. The filmmakers certainly know how to make a film with endearing characters. The animation is gorgeous. Several scenes in Up are some of the most memorable that I've ever seen in animated films. Like other Pixar films Up is also very funny. Thankfully, it's sweet humour instead of the gross humour that's present in many of today's Hollywood films. In conclusion, Up is another daring, unusual and beautiful animated film from Pixar that both children and adults will enjoy watching. I highly recommend it.
-----------------------------------------------
IMDB上观众的影评,可以根据自己的需要改一下

UP, Pixar's latest animated feature, is just delightful. But how do you go about extolling the movie's virtues without giving away its surprises? Like the kid at the beginning of the movie, you don't ...

全部展开

UP, Pixar's latest animated feature, is just delightful. But how do you go about extolling the movie's virtues without giving away its surprises? Like the kid at the beginning of the movie, you don't try to conquer the immovable force; you work around it.
The one clue I can give away – because it's the movie's heavily hyped premise – is that Carl Fredrickson, a gruffy old widower (voiced with gruffy old charm by Ed Asner), miraculously inflates enough balloons to use his house as an aircraft. Soon, he finds himself reluctantly sharing his ride with a short-attention-spanned kid named Russell.
I'll also mention a couple of other items that can gauge your potential interest in the movie. One is a gag that is a take-off on a famous painting – perhaps too inside of an inside joke, but typical of Pixar's cheery attempts to appeal to viewers of all ages.
Also, part of the plot involves Carl's long-held wish to meet a Lindbergh-type adventurer named Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer!). This is another in-joke that's even vaguer than the first one. Cartoon historians know that Walt Disney started in the cartoon biz by creating Oswald the Rabbit for producer Charles Mintz, who then greedily stole the rights to Disney's creation. This gives you a pretty good idea where the ostensible hero Muntz stands in the scheme of things.
Beyond that, I can only offer you some enticing clues about the characters. There's a dog who's the leader of his pack and in menacing beyond measure, until he opens his mouth and gets one of the movie's biggest laughs. There's a huge, awkward bird that is a big laugh-getter at first. Then she becomes a real enough character that – at least in the audience I was in – when she's injured, she elicits screams of fright worthy of Bambi's late mother.
There's surprising, heartfelt emotion, vivid imagery (you can almost touch the landscapes and skies), and a music score by Michael Giacchino that's practically a character in the movie – particularly in a thoughtful montage that takes Carl from childhood to widowhood.
There aren't many (or at least not enough) live-action movies that are engrossing as this cartoon. Pixar Studios has gotten to be one of those movie icons that shouldn't even have to deliver a premise to get funded anymore. The moneymen should just shut up, hand over the money, and trust they'll get a product that will appeal to everyone.
UP is only the second Pixar feature to get a PG rating, only for mildly intense imagery and action – nothing off-color in the least. Again, if you can handle "Bambi," this film should be a breeze.
这个还不错，你随便选两段就好了

收起

调侃一下
导演与编剧的对话：
这片子里没有一个反面角色，导演说：不行！必须有一个。 于是编剧说：那个孩子怎么样？ 导演说：不是你疯了就是我疯了。 编剧又说：老头怎么样？ 导演说：你丫的见过主角最后变成反面角色的儿童片么？ 编剧想了想说：那就老头的妻子吧？ 导演说：死人还能出来？你以为我拍的是僵尸片？把你脑子里的水都倒出来再编戏。 编剧没辙了，最后说：那就那个飞...

全部展开

调侃一下
导演与编剧的对话：
这片子里没有一个反面角色，导演说：不行！必须有一个。 于是编剧说：那个孩子怎么样？ 导演说：不是你疯了就是我疯了。 编剧又说：老头怎么样？ 导演说：你丫的见过主角最后变成反面角色的儿童片么？ 编剧想了想说：那就老头的妻子吧？ 导演说：死人还能出来？你以为我拍的是僵尸片？把你脑子里的水都倒出来再编戏。 编剧没辙了，最后说：那就那个飞行英雄吧。 导演大怒：飞行英雄在老头还是孩子的时候就是成年人了，老头都快老死了他还能上荧幕么？猪头。 最后编剧说那这戏里就只剩下狗和房子了，你选一个吧！ 导演想了想说：还是老飞行英雄吧。房子怪物的动画上次公司拍过了，肯定通不过，狗变坏的动画也太多了，拍了没有市场。就这样英雄堕落了。——sq

收起