IQ is more important than EQ辩论赛:我是正方IQ的,给我一些IQ的观点,要英语式的!我要的是IQ方面的,我是论述IQ的优点!

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/21 00:14:47
IQ is more important than EQ辩论赛:我是正方IQ的,给我一些IQ的观点,要英语式的!我要的是IQ方面的,我是论述IQ的优点!
xY]%E+ $홅aUeuwtwVu"AC@ &";ȟڿU}vxa܋>O^U6yl9W}[uy<;x'yꓝݓy pxœ?N߻vNot ~0/7~_^2yg oB½ks/UDVir:yq^Cԭ7.'ondzλw~wTi\\[/TF*;``۾Pjg7O+*zfnYc<slύuZlze4q ¶3՚M93("Aʴ r]5B*/N4핛N^V͝iL֘rW{}e@m+}'mU݄Δ`us`fΕ;hX}Yrjf:tjipŷ7kCe;=Lh-`Жi˜TmoM1 70㡷Pds.>Oqr~sھ4:dRzaVtx*ċct~ۥ0 ^5F1˰nNZEe 9 a[?tG@67[9QόG`gS{ozF˻gҋm^yQK;L3襛wx_l>\V0ˬjzWfSؒK)-F‡ډ>`RW쯝ۓSk2dAՄ#*Le9L<>Xԥ(L ӉzbQ)0~> יD`MtA1{V8O/u:7Q/&V(I ,Wja)1~<MpViCm曉^P-OVdL]%r3&_)+5Q}D6]+'yK)X"p<7V2Q,[-M9ZT}=|eK&0)\ue}GG1eò~|]muf$$3$rֻ8ϼ="3/up,H!O"(, MQJ&C{f޳ef"T*}jSB \C_:7S9Spu3a+CJlJѓ(zjr>6ıg* a;mL3"w[ ښ bR .7o&2="ZEP lSq'ĬņнIy#PRIhq\Ucf3dXnͰhIFh!F(Uha T,7'gaY,-=x نBqڶC!F_*/AKrl K1j\P1bz䑤P_.Z"G:lbbY (FJH,@N,v'U#Aبՠm@ILƳVDSi$ڇ\K7ƪҶ8wB Ď.Id]ƒi_T)-i f^19Q2mpt3) -w#KӅ$xd&ET6f%Z 'F!=BܤЃ?t!(",g&E1]>7VH; .٘:$.c|L_F q@|z1I Z4 1e E*)AZjIԛCq^s>CWر kօ e9׋؅Q eQ ϑ/X$bF,DR (Ȧ w!qK]C y 3"q` t =Rԍ:N=zB.Pr O_G2LsJ#X VL6ڄ@M Č,mIDQTV LPnt\D ~hJ.0 ug?!oy(c^A%&D]^7]p4e"&*I-^'xF̈́. K^ n3=Rxgr2KtXm!0)߄CvT( /DI9B G >̺voA4*²kwD'6"*g41 J# 3 s%TC9>Fy&cX.}GڊߓV`i:W@;.J|!@`DMNJ W(|!ws٘bwՖl63|x2QGV#IԝȇBjPD{6: d0]0# Dk0sr~C¶MrG"P6ζCF}GY\b/A?ܔ+##@ay2l|0x[}g-_ ,UNֻ\ QSop?iq!ܘ%;xd#;;,98,ATX­]Ccy~ó}L.B䖓c:^C,*{?~w:7'9˷o{Yrx{ow?N?K? r|w_~5Z]+Tb0huظa6_j

IQ is more important than EQ辩论赛:我是正方IQ的,给我一些IQ的观点,要英语式的!我要的是IQ方面的,我是论述IQ的优点!
IQ is more important than EQ
辩论赛:我是正方IQ的,给我一些IQ的观点,要英语式的!
我要的是IQ方面的,我是论述IQ的优点!

IQ is more important than EQ辩论赛:我是正方IQ的,给我一些IQ的观点,要英语式的!我要的是IQ方面的,我是论述IQ的优点!
我自己总结了一点关于IQ比EQ有用的话,不知道够不够if a person only has a high EQ,but with a low IQ,how can he/she to get through with the school life?we all know that in school,we are facing new knowledge everyday,everynight when we back to home,we have to do a lot of difficult homework,during a semester,we need to do a large quantity of quizes and exams.If we do not have a good IQ,how can we deal with all these things?EQ is useful in deal with social relationship,but if we do not have a high IQ,we can not go to the university,we can not understand what we learned,are you sure we still can get a good job?if we do not have a good job,how can we have good social relationship?Do you think EQ can help us in this?

If we don't own high IQ, does it mean that we will never achieve the success? The answer is ''no''. We still have another form of attribute called "EQ''. What are ''EQ'' for? As a matter of fact, it i...

全部展开

If we don't own high IQ, does it mean that we will never achieve the success? The answer is ''no''. We still have another form of attribute called "EQ''. What are ''EQ'' for? As a matter of fact, it is independent of IQ and play an important role of deciding how we can lead our own lives. It means an attitude of looking at things at your hands, people around you, so to speak, the outside world and yourself. A person with high EQ makes out how to cope with everything which he have to face and can handles it successfully. He also knows how to get on well with other people even if he dislikes them. Maybe his IQ is not high, however, it doesn't prevent him from embracing the success. Maybe many people who are smarter than him are willing to help him because of his kindness.
There is another one:
http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/5981658
The truth is that we can do little to change our IQ but do much to improve our EQ greatly. As long as you pay more attention to study practical EQ techniques and apply them to real life, you will find your life is becoming better than before and success probably is waving its hands ahead of you.
IQ vs EQ
by R. Rubadeau
While IQ (Intelligence Quotient) defines how smart you are, EQ (Emotional Quotient) defines how well you use what smarts you have. Peter Salovey, Yale psychologist and author of the term EQ, states that IQ gets you hired, EQ gets you promoted. He also suggests that it's important to redefine, in our complex world, what it means to be smart. In short, when it comes to "predicting future successes," brainpower, as measured by IQ and standardized achievement tests, may actually matter less than the character, or EQ of an individual.
Salovey tells of a simple test where four year olds are invited into a room and are given the following instruction: "You can have this marshmallow right now; or if you wait, you can have two marshmallows when I get back." Then, the researcher leaves. Some kids grab for the treat the second he's out the door, while others wait for the researcher to return. The results are recorded and Science waits for the kids to grow up. By the time the kids reach high school, significant differences appear between the two groups. The kids who held out for two marshmallows were better adjusted, more popular, more adventurous, more confident, and more dependable than kids in the quick gratification group. The latter group was also more likely to be lonely, more easily frustrated, more stubborn, more likely to buckle under stress, and more likely to shy away from challenges. When both groups took scholastic aptitude tests, the "hold out group" walloped the "quick gratification group by 210 points (the test scores range from a minimum of 200 points to a maximum of 800, with an average for all students of 500 points).
Did you ever wonder what happened to the smartest kid in the class who didn't end up being successful, or why some of your friends survive the greatest trauma while others crumble over minor issues? Perhaps it is because of differences in a person's EQ. EQ is not the opposite of IQ, and indeed it is hoped that people have generous quantities of both. But, there is little doubt that people without sufficient EQ will have a hard time surviving in life.
For five generations researchers have been discussing whether it's possible to raise a person's IQ. Geneticists say No, while social scientists say Yes. But while brain power researchers continue the debate, social science researchers have concluded that it's possible to improve a person's EQ, and in particular, a person's "people skills," such as empathy, graciousness, and the ability to "read" a social situation. Social scientists continually cite situations where experiences have modified a person's EQ. For example, educational researchers indicate that when normal students are introduced to disabled peers, those in the former group dramatically improve their ability to become empathetic and gracious. Additionally, the introduction of behaviourally disturbed students in a class of normal aged peers increases the ability of the latter group to learn to "read" social situations. A more profound improvement is frequently noted in the behaviourally disturbed student as well.
Social scientists conclude that EQ is perhaps best observed in people described as either pessimists or optimists. Optimists have high EQ and treat obstacles as minor, while the pessimistic low-EQ group personalizes all setbacks. In social research circles, high EQ denotes one's ability to survive, and it's here that there may be an overlap between EQ, IQ, genetics and environment. In this regard, I am reminded of the words of Darwin, "The biggest, the smartest, and the strongest are not the survivors. Rather, the survivors are the most adaptable." Those of us who survive and thrive in this complex world are not only the most adaptable, but also the most optimistic and the most likely to have a high EQ.
要不要给你翻译出来?
二:

收起

全都是讲eq更重要的 .... Emotional person is not so Intelligent, but an Intelligent person can handle emotional situations very well