Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话怎么理解呢?人教版九年级英语P120的3A的课文里面,有这样一句话——Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话中,为什么live后不加in呢?课文接下来又出

来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：作业帮 时间：2024/11/06 04:08:58
Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话怎么理解呢?人教版九年级英语P120的3A的课文里面,有这样一句话——Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话中,为什么live后不加in呢?课文接下来又出
xTnF:Vp]˺;DeJiv\$W"5cAJm_y+Bϐ^EvùsDft$ZfVLJthLbIJߣq &yY?/^gg_T<d˯qݥ%A,&$QvüayS6Jmzy^놂Uy%sx-sVvd{`F}%:fcdlk{tfIA%PG$ֶf}$ni =nD p-hPe}\-8'+iw"qyQf/k9l<]jl5 _ċ+r79rވZآ.\D-}_啋а7lYB]1|%OG^ ȣ_4xVT+آ5u ,$̫ 3V##򐏖V?_Yvn#U!p-:yAFa>$؇xG(e-VH#>*8PM(] IzW -8 8E5T nES4blKW Μ|Mwk& 4@C?מ(x 8Q{ OK0tD{Hw4mWDk/pRsj ՗S$)Ï#It򻟀f$ǮI:VR+j>>z D)ԫؤ@n\=.?yQ">؇Їh ;:e$5 ڷ"Dj >?8.?

Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话怎么理解呢?人教版九年级英语P120的3A的课文里面,有这样一句话——Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话中,为什么live后不加in呢?课文接下来又出
Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话怎么理解呢?
人教版九年级英语P120的3A的课文里面,有这样一句话——
Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.
这句话中,为什么live后不加in呢?
课文接下来又出现了句子：I have never seen one I liked or one that was suitable for animals to live in.
为什么这里又加了live后面in呢?
语法上应该怎样理解这两句话?
谢谢!

Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话怎么理解呢?人教版九年级英语P120的3A的课文里面,有这样一句话——Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话中,为什么live后不加in呢?课文接下来又出
答案已经修改得更加易懂了,有哪里不懂请提出…我会帮你解释的,打字真的很累…
这两个例句都是正确的.
诚然,当动词不定式作定语时,to do与所修饰的名词是介词+宾语的关系,（比如这里是live in the zoo）就应当加上适当的介词,使得结构完整.如：Here is a seat for you to sit on.Please give me a pen to write the telephone number with.所以,第二个例句用了介词.
但是,当名词为time、place、way时,可以/应当省略相应的介词（如你句子中的in）,显得更地道.（这句话是复旦大学语法指南上的原话）如：He had no place to live and thus died in the street.
…
…
衷心地祝你快乐!…

两种都可以。第一句中in可省。

补足语的问题，看句子成分是否需要，再+

zoos are terrible places for animals to live.places 在句中作什么成分? Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.应该live 后有in Zoos are terrible places for animals to live这句话有错吗? Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.一句中live后面为什么不加in? Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.一句中live后面为什么不加in? Zoos are terrible places for animals to live 中为什么没in Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.次句句末为什么不用in? Zoos are terrible places for animals to live in.此处to live in做什么成分 Zoos are terrible places for animals to live. Zoos are suitable for animals to live in.为什么第一句live后没介词；第二句live后有介词 zoos are terrible places for animals to live这句中to live 为何不加in?另外to live在句中做什么成分? to live in 和to live的区别例句“：zoos are terrible place for animals to livethat was suitable for animals to live in zoos are terrible places for animals to live .I have never been seen one that was suitable for animals to live in.什么时候live后放 in, 不及物动词后面的介词在什么情况下去掉Zoos are terrible places for animals to live为什么后面没有in?讲一下为什么要去掉介词? Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话怎么理解呢?人教版九年级英语P120的3A的课文里面,有这样一句话——Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.这句话中,为什么live后不加in呢?课文接下来又出 ----It is said that a new zoo will be built in our town.---- I’m __________ it.Zoos are terrible----It is said that a new zoo will be built in our town.---- I’m __________ it.Zoos are terrible for animals.A.through B.besides C.against D.except live 的用法zoos are terrible places for animals to live与i have never seen a zoo that was suitable for animals to live in为什么第二句有in,请详细讲解 they looked for a quiet place to live in ,不定式后的介词in要吗?要是不要，可教本里有这样一句话：zoos are terrible places for animals to live in. 英语翻译I am writing to say that I am against building a new zoo in our town.Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.I've visited a lot of zoos in my life,and I have never seen one I liked or one that was suitable for animals to live in.Just