关于一个独立主格结构的句子If i had been invited to your birthday party,i would have bought a birthday gift for you.若我想把这句话写成独立主格结构 那么if引导的从句该如何改写?我是这么写的:Having been invi
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/20 07:34:39
关于一个独立主格结构的句子If i had been invited to your birthday party,i would have bought a birthday gift for you.若我想把这句话写成独立主格结构 那么if引导的从句该如何改写?我是这么写的:Having been invi
关于一个独立主格结构的句子
If i had been invited to your birthday party,i would have bought a birthday gift for you.
若我想把这句话写成独立主格结构 那么if引导的从句该如何改写?
我是这么写的:Having been invited to your birthday party,i would have bought a birthday gift for you.可别人说这么不对.主句和从句的主语都是I 我把它省略了 用了一个ing代替了连词与主语 错在哪里了.
希望有人能帮忙改下这句话.
关于一个独立主格结构的句子If i had been invited to your birthday party,i would have bought a birthday gift for you.若我想把这句话写成独立主格结构 那么if引导的从句该如何改写?我是这么写的:Having been invi
你改写的句子是不对的.
因为:If i had been invited to your birthday party,i would have bought a birthday gift for you.
这个句子是一个虚拟语气,意思是:如果我收到邀请参加你的生日聚会,我就会给你买一个生日礼物.(实际上,我既没有收到邀请,也没有参加你的生日聚会,也没有买礼物)
而你改写的句子:Having been invited to your birthday party,i would have bought a birthday gift for you.语法是错的.前半句是完成时的进行时态作伴随状语.后面半句还保持的是虚拟语气.这句的意思是:收到你邀请去参加你的生日聚会(实际上,我收到了邀请,也参加了),我就会给你买一个生日礼物(实际上没买).这句话的句意就说不通了.
原来的句子用虚拟语气表示对过去事情的假设,实际上事情没有这样发生.所以if 引导的条件状语从句不能改写,所以你说的独立主格结构也就无从谈起了.
这句不适合写成独立主格, 用独立主格的前提是,主语不一致, 不一致明白了吗, 这句两主语都是I 不行.
你原来的句子是虚拟语态,可改写成:
Had I been invited to your birthday party ,I would have bought a birthday gift for you。
至于独立主格结构的事,前面的朋友谈了不少,我不说了。