1、If the evidence shows that there are more cars runningon the road today than before,.2、the number of cars has doubled in the past ten years,making riding bicycle on the road become dangerous.不对该怎么改,最好能重语法角度解释下,
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/12/01 10:12:38
1、If the evidence shows that there are more cars runningon the road today than before,.2、the number of cars has doubled in the past ten years,making riding bicycle on the road become dangerous.不对该怎么改,最好能重语法角度解释下,
1、If the evidence shows that there are more cars runningon the road today than before,.
2、the number of cars has doubled in the past ten years,making riding bicycle on the road become dangerous.
不对该怎么改,最好能重语法角度解释下,
1、If the evidence shows that there are more cars runningon the road today than before,.2、the number of cars has doubled in the past ten years,making riding bicycle on the road become dangerous.不对该怎么改,最好能重语法角度解释下,
第1个句子改为:
If evidence shows that ...
evidence shows "证据表明",其中evidence 是不可数名词,相当于information,且是泛指的,故不用定冠词the
第2个句子改为:
..,making riding a bicycle on the road dangerous
make sth.+ 形容词(作宾补),所以删除become;riding bicycle 之间应该有不定冠词a
第一句没什么问题,除了 running on 可能是无意中连在一起了,要分开写外,别的没问题,再就是这个句子并没完,但是这个是你省略了,不算错。
第二句 有半句要改一下。因为你用的making...这样的分词结构,看起来像是一个表示伴随动作的结果状语,但是因为making的逻辑主语不可以是 the number,所以不对。 我把它改成一个非限定性的定语从句:
the n...
全部展开
第一句没什么问题,除了 running on 可能是无意中连在一起了,要分开写外,别的没问题,再就是这个句子并没完,但是这个是你省略了,不算错。
第二句 有半句要改一下。因为你用的making...这样的分词结构,看起来像是一个表示伴随动作的结果状语,但是因为making的逻辑主语不可以是 the number,所以不对。 我把它改成一个非限定性的定语从句:
the number of cars has doubled in the past ten years, which has made riding bicycles on the road become dangerous.
另外bicycles已经改成了复数。定语从句用的现在完成时,表示这个事情从过去开始一直到现在还在进行中。
收起
第一个,if条件状语从句,没问题。
第二个, bicycle应该是bicycles。 dangerous前面加上more