英语翻译环境保护自然为本 环境保护应以自然为本,自然作为我们生存的基础,若没有自然,更谈不上人类的存在与发展,有人说人是万物之灵,没有人,就谈不上环境保护,可我想说的是,如果没有

英语翻译环境保护自然为本 环境保护应以自然为本,自然作为我们生存的基础,若没有自然,更谈不上人类的存在与发展,有人说人是万物之灵,没有人,就谈不上环境保护,可我想说的是,如果没有
英语翻译
环境保护自然为本
环境保护应以自然为本,自然作为我们生存的基础,若没有自然,更谈不上人类的存在与发展,有人说人是万物之灵,没有人,就谈不上环境保护,可我想说的是,如果没有人那么环境还需要保护,没有人的破坏,自然现在应该还是一片生机勃勃吧!有些人自认为人类是世界的主体,世界上的一切生物都是为人,而存在的,多么可笑啊,人只是大自然的一个产物而以,当原始人猿从树上走下来的时候,若是自然又突然发生了什么不可思议的变化的话,那人类的出现就变成一个神话了.不知各位看过人类发展的那个记录片没,那里有一句话我觉得是十分精典的;人的出现,是世界的一个偶然,而且是几万万分之一的偶然创造了人类.
动物的存在不是因为人的存在,如果没有人的话,它们也许会生活更加无忧无虑,每种生物都有它自己存在的价值,也都有它自己存在的意义,老虎要保护,老鼠要被消灭,完全是人类根据它对自身的影响而强加给它的,若人类不在,你能说那种动物是有益的那种是有害的吗?
古雅典文明的覆灭,难到不是很好的说明吗?人类的文明无论发展到什么境界,不都是需要生存的环境吗?不以自然为本的环境保护是不完全的,是带有人类中心主义思想的,人是可以创造,可以毁灭好多东西,可是自然呢,是人类可以创造的了的吗,但毫无疑问,人可以摧毁它的.人类的地球2号计划不是又一次失败了吗?

英语翻译环境保护自然为本 环境保护应以自然为本,自然作为我们生存的基础,若没有自然,更谈不上人类的存在与发展,有人说人是万物之灵,没有人,就谈不上环境保护,可我想说的是,如果没有
Nature-based Environmental Protection
Nature-based environmental protection should naturally as the basis for our survival,if not natural,not to mention the existence of mankind and development of human beings are superior to some people say,no one,there would be no environmental protection,I would like to be ,Said that if no one then also need to protect the environment,no one's destruction,it is a natural vitality it!Some people think that since the main body of human beings is one of the world,the world's people are all biological,and the existence of,What a ridiculous ah,history tells us that the development of human nature is a product to which,when the primitive ape from the tree down,if all of a sudden natural and what an incredible change,then the emergence of humanity becomes a A myth.I wonder if you read the human development that no documentary,a word I think there is the very classical; people,is one of the world a chance,but a few万万分之一the chance to create a human.
Not because of the existence of the animal's existence,if not,they may be more carefree life,each has its own biological existence,it has its own existence,to protect the tiger,mouse Be wiped out entirely in accordance with its own human effects imposed on it,if not human,you can say the kind of animal that is useful is it harmful?
Athens destruction of the ancient civilization,so difficult that it is not a very good description?The development of human civilization,no matter what state they are not required to survive the environment?Not nature-based environmental protection is incomplete,is a human Center of ideas,people can create,you can destroy a lot of things,but the natural,human beings are created by the right,there is no doubt that one can destroy it.Mankind of the Earth 2 is not a plan to once again failed It?

Nature-based Environmental Protection
Nature-based environmental protection should naturally as the basis for our survival, if not natural, not to mention the existence of mankind and development...

全部展开

Nature-based Environmental Protection
Nature-based environmental protection should naturally as the basis for our survival, if not natural, not to mention the existence of mankind and development of human beings are superior to some people say, no one, there would be no environmental protection, I would like to be , Said that if no one then also need to protect the environment, no one's destruction, it is a natural vitality it! Some people think that since the main body of human beings is one of the world, the world's people are all biological, and the existence of, What a ridiculous ah, history tells us that the development of human nature is a product to which, when the primitive ape from the tree down, if all of a sudden natural and what an incredible change, then the emergence of humanity becomes a A myth. I wonder if you read the human development that no documentary, a word I think there is the very classical; people, is one of the world a chance, but a few万万分之一the chance to create a human.
Not because of the existence of the animal's existence, if not, they may be more carefree life, each has its own biological existence, it has its own existence, to protect the tiger, mouse Be wiped out entirely in accordance with its own human effects imposed on it, if not human, you can say the kind of animal that is useful is it harmful?
Athens destruction of the ancient civilization, so difficult that it is not a very good description? The development of human civilization, no matter what state they are not required to survive the environment? Not nature-based environmental protection is incomplete, is a human Center of ideas, people can create, you can destroy a lot of things, but the natural, human beings are created by the right, there is no doubt that one can destroy it. Mankind of the Earth 2 is not a plan to once again failed It?
中文 » 英语 翻译
更好的翻译建议
感谢您为 Google 翻译提供翻译建议。我们会利用您的建议在将来更新我们的系统时提高翻译质量。 Nature-based Environmental Protection
Nature-based environmental protection should naturally as the basis for our survival, if not natural, not to mention the existence of mankind and development of human beings are superior to some people say, no one, there would be no environmental protection, I would like to be , Said that if no one then also need to protect the environment, no one's destruction, it is a natural vitality it! Some people think that since the main body of human beings is one of the world, the world's people are all biological, and the existence of, What a ridiculous ah, history tells us that the development of human nature is a product to which, when the primitive ape from the tree down, if all of a sudden natural and what an incredible change, then the emergence of humanity becomes a A myth. I wonder if you read the human development that no documentary, a word I think there is the very classical; people, is one of the world a chance, but a few万万分之一the chance to create a human.
Not because of the existence of the animal's existence, if not, they may be more carefree life, each has its own biological existence, it has its own existence, to protect the tiger, mouse Be wiped out entirely in accordance with its own human effects imposed on it, if not human, you can say the kind of animal that is useful is it harmful?
Athens destruction of the ancient civilization, so difficult that it is not a very good description? The development of human civilization, no matter what state they are not required to survive the environment? Not nature-based environmental protection is incomplete, is a human Center of ideas, people can create, you can destroy a lot of things, but the natural, human beings are created by the right, there is no doubt that one can destroy it. Mankind of the Earth 2 is not a plan to once again failed It?


翻译网页

中文 » 英语 翻译
Google 主页 - 关于 Google 翻译

收起

Protect the environment is that protect the environment should take the natural world as at ease , is our survival basis at ease, if not natural, with existence of farther from being human being devel...

全部展开

Protect the environment is that protect the environment should take the natural world as at ease , is our survival basis at ease, if not natural, with existence of farther from being human being developing, that somebody criticizes person is a man-- the wisest of all creatures , does not have person, protect the environment far from being, but I want to be right , the environment needs destroying protecting , not having person , ought to a slice be that are full of vigour comparing with others at ease now if not having person! Some people main body from thinking that human being is the world, in the world all living things is conduct, but existence's, what laughable Oh, development of history tell us, human being's turn up has become a myth when person walks down on being only a outcome of nature but complying with a tree in order to, pawning primitive anthropopithecus, if what inconceivable change's words to happened at ease suddenly. That documentary wondering if everybody had looked at human being developing is had no, that there has one talking about my feel like is to be skill in a canon's very; People's turn up , a chance being the world, and be several tens of thousand one over ten-thousand's chance have created human being. Animal's existence is not the existence because of person , they maybe are able to live to be light of heart especially , every kind of living things has there exist in itself value , also, the significance , tiger that It both there exists in itself need to protect , the mouse needs to be died out if not having person,being that human being is based on an impact of it over oneself completely but foisting it on, if that human being is absent , you can say that animal is to that having benefit is harmful? Acient civilized Athens complete collapse , very good explanation difficult to arrive at fault? What realm human being's civilization arrives at disregarding developing , is not to need the environment existing? Not taking the natural world as this protect the environment is incomplete , being as well as having anthropocentric doctrine thought's , person is not bad be created by, can destroy a lot of thing, but natural woollen cloth , be that human being is not bad be created by but undisputed, person can destroy it. Is the earth of human being plan 2 not that the once has failed?

收起