请教一个英语语法.有两句话：(1)Put simply,China has benn investing too much,too fast,particularly in its export-oriented manufacturing sector.(2)Simply put,without specialists,our society would find itself bogged down in the Sargasso sea

来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：作业帮 时间：2024/11/20 13:33:08
请教一个英语语法.有两句话：(1)Put simply,China has benn investing too much,too fast,particularly in its export-oriented manufacturing sector.(2)Simply put,without specialists,our society would find itself bogged down in the Sargasso sea
xTN@Y䂠ۈ.!qDzPv BPBZ^<@T$ *;`mR9gν>4خs,_!:l(hv;偑7EiuZ0JcMȚmR6%exZ$6c*qKņ: @PtbPd qjÔC-*M)4M]+XULjJ2ILJ*Z+jMT dD4-qli cϷwE $,'T!"Nny/g3`Gg^y]]vorxFz*B%VsUV9el d@ՊS+sv?K mG8|ib}7VD<;bs*"]g"('V\_I7[Gka3>} w Jw~]\Bise&<p+Yz}VD0~ >x#om.@O@o?@p@5*C[(6q}Z8q+ļCI?4BlԱ6X8aq׷IDŊ'N^T5am-|gfrk\y[ M+"<~NەpQc@(Buy6/We@~[{

请教一个英语语法.有两句话：(1)Put simply,China has benn investing too much,too fast,particularly in its export-oriented manufacturing sector.(2)Simply put,without specialists,our society would find itself bogged down in the Sargasso sea
请教一个英语语法.
有两句话：
(1)Put simply,China has benn investing too much,too fast,particularly in its export-oriented manufacturing sector.
(2)Simply put,without specialists,our society would find itself bogged down in the Sargasso sea of information overload.
（1）两句话的Put simply和Simply put是同一个意思死么?
（2）如果是同一个意思,它们在各自的句子中的成分是什么?
（3）这两句话是倒装句么?

请教一个英语语法.有两句话：(1)Put simply,China has benn investing too much,too fast,particularly in its export-oriented manufacturing sector.(2)Simply put,without specialists,our society would find itself bogged down in the Sargasso sea
这两个词意思相同.
他们的区别在于simply的句子成分不一样,在put simply中,simply作为句子中的补语,而simply put在句子中状语.一个做补语,一个做状语的目的显然就是要强调的对象不同,put simply主要强调的是simply,而simply put要强调的是put.
第一句不存在倒装现象,put simply就相当于是generally speaking的用法.
第二句是一句强调句,强调without speacialists

应该算是状语吧，意思差不多了。就跟我们平时说：我觉得，怎么怎么样。“我觉得”后面的句子在意思上应该是完全独立的。

一个意思，我感觉。

请教一个英语语法.有两句话：(1)Put simply,China has benn investing too much,too fast,particularly in its export-oriented manufacturing sector.(2)Simply put,without specialists,our society would find itself bogged down in the Sargasso sea 请教一个关于将来时态的英语语法题 请教一个英语语法问题,欢迎指导~The soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.这句话中 had the eyes no tears是什么成份呢? 请教大师关于一个英语语法 call sb about sth 以及tell sb about sth 这两词组中 ...请教大师关于一个英语语法call sb about sth 以及tell sb about sth 这两词组中 ＂about sth＂ 是作什么成分?有人说双宾'有人 问一道英语语法题判断对错Congee is easy to make.[put/puts]some [rice/rices]第一个选put 第二个选rices请问回答有没有错?如果正确请说明原因 They only put tea leaves in theirs cups or in teatops.这句话怎么翻译?为什么有put、leaves两个动词?为什么一个加s 一个不加? 英语语法请教it is fine day today 这句话翻译后是：天气很好,今天可是这里面没有天气这个词啊.day 和today 一个是日子,一个是今天,貌似啰嗦而且重复,无法理解啊 英语语法请教 come income in 英语语法大全?哪有?求一个 英语语法有关的问题.What things are in it?You don't be worried. 这两句话的语法有什么错误吗? 英语语法：could与完成时连用的问题比如说这样一个例句：She could not have done that.这句话的意思到底是下面两种意思的哪个?还是两种可能有?1.她本不会那样做的.2.她不可能做了那件事.主要是 这两句话有什么区别?they do not have to put their heart into studying和 they do not put their heart into studying~有什么区别.这里的have to 请教两道语文题!1、古人常用“三”表示多数,如：“三人行,必有我师焉”,请你再举两例.2、“岁寒,然后知松柏之后凋也.”请找一个与这句话意思相近的成语、俗语. 秘密让一个女人更有魅力的英文怎么说请教各位,这句话的英文怎么说的 英语语法问题：介词和副词 here之类何处做为地方副词地方副词前面加不能加介词是吗?有2句话：1 Just leave it here.2 Bring it in here.这两句话都有here,如何区分here是不是地方副词?第一句为什么是 英语语法中是否有put sth. on where+定语从句?还是put sth. where?如题!定语从句语法点,求解释 英语语法,5两题 【急!】请教几道英语语法题..1.The research requires more money than_____.A have been put in B.has been put in C.being put in D.to be put in但是它的解析我完全没有明白,特别是那个more than.2.____ if I had arrived yesterday w