英语翻译The dangling ring for switching off sockets is simply a bad idea.The tilt-switch that comes with most of them (at least in the UK where they use that three-pronged system) is much handier and safer,and I bet even easier and cheaper to man

英语翻译The dangling ring for switching off sockets is simply a bad idea.The tilt-switch that comes with most of them (at least in the UK where they use that three-pronged system) is much handier and safer,and I bet even easier and cheaper to man
英语翻译
The dangling ring for switching off sockets is simply a bad idea.The tilt-switch that comes with most of them (at least in the UK where they use that three-pronged system) is much handier and safer,and I bet even easier and cheaper to manufacture.And have nothing dangling from the socket,to lure pets or babies.Plus this string and ring -system is probably much more fragile and thus has a shorter lifespan and only adds to waste.
I’m not sure about the merits of the newspaper box or the flashlight-thing,but I’m pretty sure that treating people as total idiots like in the notebook-designs isn’t going to go through too well.This is,if anything,design veiled in green ideas,in a most patronising way possible.
Of these,only the notebook/post-its seems like an interesting idea,provided that the covers fit around the pad well enough to prevent the pages from flying off too easily.
I realise designers want to do new stuff,and it is good that they think about the environment when doing that.But I must admit I find it very hypocritical to peddle useless junk that only adds to our carbon footprint and claim to solve some minuscule (or even non-existing) environmental issue while doing it.People need to start seriously thinking about their consumption and stop trying to buy their way out this situation,to tackle climate change with pseudo-aware consumption.First step to seeing effects in proportion would be to start thinking about the whole life-cycle of products rather than just some “green gimmick” added to them in the marketing department.Second step would be to start re-using and re-claiming and re-cycling.And this is where designers come in,start making new stuff out of the old stuff,and make sure your new stuff is durable and can be made into new stuff rather than discarded when people are done using it.
I hope you don’t read this as an aggressive rant or think I’m being partronising,because I try to be neither,just open a conversation here where many design-minded people meet

英语翻译The dangling ring for switching off sockets is simply a bad idea.The tilt-switch that comes with most of them (at least in the UK where they use that three-pronged system) is much handier and safer,and I bet even easier and cheaper to man
对于关掉插座悬挂环只是一个坏主意.倾斜开关的,其中大部分（至少在英国,他们使用三管齐下系统）是非常顺手,更安全,我敢肯定更容易和更便宜的制造来.并没有什么从套接字悬,以吸引宠物或婴儿.加上这个字符串和环系统可能是十分脆弱,因而具有寿命较短,只增加了浪费.
我不知道报纸的框或手电筒优点的东西,但我敢肯定地对待人民,像笔记本电脑总白痴,设计是不会通过太好.这是,如果有的话,设计暗绿色的想法光顾的最可能的方式.
其中,只有笔记本电脑/后它似乎是一个有趣的想法,但前提是覆盖了垫还不够,以防止飞脱的网页很容易适应.
我明白设计者想要做新的东西,这是件好事,他们认为对环境的时候这样做.但我必须承认,我感到很虚伪兜售无用的垃圾,只有增加我们的碳足迹,并声称解决了一些微不足道的（甚至是不存在的）的环境问题,而这样做.人们需要开始认真了解他们的消费思想,停止试图购买这一局势的办法,来解决气候与伪知道消费的变化.第一步看到效果的比例会开始思考的整个生命周期的产品,而不仅仅是一些“绿色噱头”,增加了他们在营销部门.第二步将是开始重新使用和重新主张和循环再用.而这正是设计师来了,开始做新的东西走出旧的东西,并确保您的新东西是持久的,可到新的东西,而不是丢弃了,当人们使用完它.
我希望你不读积极咆哮作为这个或认为我partronising,因为我尽量不,刚刚打开的谈话许多设计志趣相投的人会面